Part 2 explores natural and man-made fields, animal magnetoreception mechanisms, and pertinent studies to all wildlife kingdoms. The above issues are explored in three consecutive parts: Part 1 questions today’s ambient EMF capabilities to adversely affect wildlife, with more urgency regarding 5G technologies.
![honey select mf and emf packages honey select mf and emf packages](https://www.eneuro.org/content/eneuro/6/2/ENEURO.0483-18.2019/F2.large.jpg)
Cyto- and geno-toxic effects have been observed. Broad wildlife effects have been seen on orientation and migration, food finding, reproduction, mating, nest and den building, territorial maintenance and defense, and longevity and survivorship.
![honey select mf and emf packages honey select mf and emf packages](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/P7qRWAEqWgc/hqdefault.jpg)
Manville has testified about the impacts of cell towers on birds that, “the the entire thermal model and all FCC categorical exclusions for all the devices we see today, rests on the incorrect assumption that low-level nonionizing nonthermal radiation cannot cause DNA breaks because it is so low power the evidence to the contrary is clear and growing laboratory animals and wildlife.”
Honey select mf and emf packages license#
The race to implement 5G and the push by FCC to approve the related 5G license frequencies to industry are very troubling and downright dangerous.” “Now as a private wildlife consultant and part-time adjunct professor for Johns Hopkins University, I also continue to study the impacts of radiation on human health, welfare and safety, including impacts from millimeter-wide radiation frequencies on humans from 5G. Albert Manville, has written to the FCC on impacts to birds and higher frequencies to be used in 5G and authored numerous publications detailing research showing harm to birds. The findings of the report were later published in the journal Biology and Medicine which concludes that, “ based on current available literature, it is justified to conclude that RF-EMF radiation exposure can change neurotransmitter functions, blood-brain barrier, morphology, electrophysiology, cellular metabolism, calcium efflux, and gene and protein expression in certain types of cells even at lower intensities”.Ī now retired US Fish and Wildlife Service wildlife biologist, former lead on on telecommunications impacts, Dr.
![honey select mf and emf packages honey select mf and emf packages](https://honeyselect.blogs.allthefallen.moe/wp-content/uploads/sites/79/2018/08/a1-1.jpg)
Honey select mf and emf packages series#
An August 2012 Advisory by the Ministry of the Environment and Forests refers to the “negative effects” and makes a series of recommendations to the government. India dropped their RF limits by 1/10th of ICNIRP after a 2010 Government Report documented the majority of research studies found adverse effects to wildlife, birds and bees. Researchers concluded, “This could lead to changes in insect behaviour, physiology, and morphology over time….” ( Thielens 2018 ) The scientific simulations showed increases in absorbed power between 3% to 370% when the insects were exposed to the frequencies. “ Exposure of Insects to Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields from 2 to 120 GHz ” published in Scientific Reports is the first study to investigate how insects (including the Western honeybee) absorb the higher frequencies (2 GHz to 120 GHz) to be used in the 4G/5G rollout. The Department of Interior in a 2014 letter on the impact of cell towers on migratory birds.ĥG Frequencies are Highly Absorbed into Insects- Especially Bees “The electromagnetic radiation standards used by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) continue to be based on thermal heating, a criterion now nearly 30 years out of date and inapplicable today.” Below is just a small example of the critical research that has been done on this issue. Electromagnetic fields from powerlines, cell phones, cell towers and wireless impacts the birds, bees, wildlife and our environment.